Loading...
Loading...
Illustrative sample · not certification data
This synthetic example demonstrates the product structure. It is not a real project, does not count toward certification, and makes no contractor-quality or price-value claim.
Project
On a small screen, swipe across bids; the scope element stays visible.
| Scope element | Bid A | Bid B | Bid C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roof area / quantity | 32 squares | 30 squares | Not stated |
| Tear-off layers | 1 layer included | Up to 2 layers | Not stated |
| Decking replacement | $95 per sheet | 4 sheets included, then $110 | Allowance; rate vague |
| Ice & water shield | Eaves only | Eaves, valleys, penetrations | Code minimum |
| Wall / chimney flashing | Reuse unless damaged | New wall flashing included | As needed |
| Ventilation | Ridge vent included | Balanced system calculation | Separate price |
| Permit / disposal | Both included | Both included | Permit not stated |
| Workmanship warranty | 10 years | 25 years | Term not stated |
Bid C leaves decking exposure unresolved. “Allowance” appears without a clear number of sheets or a firm per-sheet rate, so the final total could rise after tear-off.
Bid C · page 2 · line 14 · “decking allowance as needed”
How many decking sheets, if any, are included in the total? What is the fixed installed price per additional sheet, and who approves replacement before work proceeds?
No customer-facing regional price claim appears in this sample because the evidence has not been certified for source, date, geography, and display confidence. The record remains useful as a scope comparison without inventing a range.
Build a private Decision Record for one to three complete asphalt-shingle replacement proposals or revisions.