Loading...
Loading...
Illustrative sample · not certification data
This synthetic example demonstrates the product structure. It is not a real project, does not count toward certification, and makes no contractor-quality or price-value claim.
Project
| Scope element | Bid A | Bid B | Bid C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roof area / quantity | 32 squares | 30 squares | Not stated |
| Tear-off layers | 1 layer included | Up to 2 layers | Not stated |
| Decking replacement | $95 per sheet | 4 sheets included, then $110 | Allowance; rate vague |
| Ice & water shield | Eaves only | Eaves, valleys, penetrations | Code minimum |
| Wall / chimney flashing | Reuse unless damaged | New wall flashing included | As needed |
| Ventilation | Ridge vent included | Balanced system calculation | Separate price |
| Permit / disposal | Both included | Both included | Permit not stated |
| Workmanship warranty | 10 years | 25 years | Term not stated |
Bid C leaves decking exposure unresolved. “Allowance” appears without a clear number of sheets or a firm per-sheet rate, so the final total could rise after tear-off.
How many decking sheets, if any, are included in the total? What is the fixed installed price per additional sheet, and who approves replacement before work proceeds?
No customer-facing regional price claim appears in this sample because the evidence has not been certified for source, date, geography, and display confidence. The record remains useful as a scope comparison without inventing a range.
Public checkout is paused. We are recruiting permissioned asphalt-shingle replacement projects—especially projects with two or three proposals or a revision.